Volume 2, Issue 1, February 2016, Page: 1-4
Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits
Michael S. Toder, Department of Implantology of International Center of Implantology the Ident-Clinic, Novosibirsk, Russia
Andrew I. Shevela, Center of new Medical Technologies of Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, Russia
Alexander A. Shevela, Department of Implantology of International Center of Implantology the Ident-Clinic, Novosibirsk, Russia; Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Paul A. Zheleznyi, Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Anna P. Zheleznaia, Department of Pediatric Dentistry of Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Igor V. Mayborodin, Center of new Medical Technologies of Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, Russia
Received: Mar. 10, 2016;       Accepted: May 17, 2016;       Published: Jun. 16, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11      View  3676      Downloads  143
Abstract
Screw metal implants with rough or the smooth polished were introduced surface in a tibial bone proximal condyle of not purebred rabbits. Within 6 months after operation the considerable distinctions of radiological data were revealed not. 2 months later after introduction of implants with a rough surface the effort enclosed for its twisting is, much more, than for removal of the polished product. However, stability of fixing of implants was practically made even at 6 months. On remote rough implants there is a set of tissue scraps whereas on products with a smooth surface the tissue remains were much less. Surrounding tissues strongly join a rough surface, grow into cavities, and during removal of such products there is a considerable trauma of tissues round an implantation place. Smooth implants have the smaller area of contact with organism tissues, they are fixed due to bicortical implantation, during removal easily get out and don't break off surrounding tissues.
Keywords
Screw Metal Dentistry Implants, Intra Bone Implantation, Durability of Implant Fixing, Features of Implant Removal
To cite this article
Michael S. Toder, Andrew I. Shevela, Alexander A. Shevela, Paul A. Zheleznyi, Anna P. Zheleznaia, Igor V. Mayborodin, Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits, International Journal of Dental Medicine. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Günter W. E., Dambayev G. Ts., Sysolyatin P. G., etc. Medical materials and implants with shape memory. Tomsk: Publishing house Tomsk un-that, 1998. 487 p.
[2]
Maĭborodin I. V., Iakushenko V. K., Maĭborodina V. I. Interaction of nickelide-titanium implant with tissues in human. Arkh Patol. 2002, vol. 64, № 2, p. 50-52.
[3]
Maĭborodin I. V., Shevela A. I., Matveeva V. A. et al. Morphological tissue changes after the implantation of elastic lamellar foreign bodies in the experiment. Morfologiia. 2012, vol. 141, № 2, p. 54-60.
[4]
Maiborodin I. V., Kuznetsova I. V., Beregovoy E. A. et al. Tissue reactions during the degradation of polylactide implants in the body. Morfologiia. 2013, vol. 143, № 3, p. 59-65.
[5]
Maĭborodin I. V., Shevela A. I., Kuznetsova I. V. et al. Tissue responses to silicone materials in the body. Arkh Patol. 2013, vol. 75, № 4, p. 28-33.
[6]
Miro-Mur F., Hindié M., Kandhaya-Pillai R. et al. Medical-grade silicone induces release of proinflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells without activating T cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2009, vol. 90, № 2, p. 510-520.
[7]
Rodriguez A. and Anderson J. M. Evaluation of clinical biomaterial surface effects on T lymphocyte activation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 2010, vol. 92, № 1, p. 214-220.
[8]
Rodriguez A., Meyerson H. and Anderson J.M. Quantitative in vivo cytokine analysis at synthetic biomaterial implant sites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 2009, vol. 89, № 1, p. 152-159.
[9]
Gabriel S. E., Woods J. E., O'Fallon W.M. et al. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N. Engl. J. Med., 1997, vol. 336, № 10, p. 677-682.
[10]
Kanhai R. C., Hage J. J., Karim R. B., Mulder J.W. Exceptional presenting conditions and outcome of augmentation mammaplasty in male-to-female transsexuals. Ann. Plast. Surg., 1999, vol. 43, № 5, p. 476-483.
[11]
Tebbetts J. B. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2002, vol. 109, № 4, p. 1396-1409.
Browse journals by subject